Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Nice

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1991No. B052240PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HINZ, J.

Introduction

In this case, a pension plan challenges a judgment of dissolution on two grounds. Reversing the trial court’s order that the pension plan make payments to the nonemployee former spouse, we hold that the husband, the pension plan member who wishes to continue working even though he is eligible to retire, must himself compensate his former wife for her portion of community contributions to the pension plan. We further hold that even though the pension plan does not provide “survivor benefits” to a nonemployee former wife, the judgment of dissolution must nevertheless…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Cir v. DunkinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Commissioner v. DunkinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Commissioner v. DunkinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Cramer v. San Bernardino County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API