Legal Opinion
Wethern v. Orr
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 1969No. Civ. 9180PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AULT, J. pro tem. *
Petitioner Robert Wethern appeals from a judgment of the superior court denying his petition for writ of mandate. He sought the writ to compel respondent Orr, as Director of the Department of Motor Vehicles, to set aside that department’s decision revoking his driving privilege for a period of six months under the Implied Consent Law (Veh. Code, § 13353).
No testimony was offered at the trial and the court’s finding and judgment are based upon the transcript of the testimony at the hearing before the department and the documents which were made part of that record. Prom that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Finley v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Rust v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Fallis v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Ent v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by18 opinions
- Agnew v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Walker v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Cahall v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- State v. LeavittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Strand v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.