State v. Fuksman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
468 So.2d 1067 (1985)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Jorge FUKSMAN a/K/a Jorge Isaac, Appellee.
No. 84-190.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 14, 1985.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Randi Klayman Lazarus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Alvarez & Gamba and Arturo Alvarez, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
NESBITT, Judge.
The state appeals the granting of Fuksman's motion to suppress. Finding that the trial court utilized the wrong standard in deciding the motion, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The facts, viewed in…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Pearson; Concurrence · Schwartz.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Saavedra v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Phuagnong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. AveryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.