Legal Opinion
Pedro v. Astrue
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 23, 2011No. Cv. No. 10-6047-MAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cordelia Pedro brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security deny*1008ing her applications for disability insurance benefits (DIB) under Title II and supplemental security income (SSI) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-403, 1381-1383Í. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). For the reasons that follow, I REVERSE the final decision of the Commissioner, and REMAND this case for an immediate award of benefits.
PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blacktongue v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Nicholson v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Jones v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Conley v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Ken M. ex rel. Berry M. v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.