Legal Opinion
Nicholson v. Colvin
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 5, 2015No. Case No. 1:13-CV-02306-AAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff Amanda Rene Nicholson brings this action for judicial review of a final decision for the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). For the reasons below, this case is reversed and remanded for immediate payments of. benefits.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 14, 2010, plaintiff filed her application for SSI. Tr. 169. After the application was denied…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aaron v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Andrews v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Bothum v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021
- Trisha A. Jackman v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2026