H. Feldman's Sons Co. v. Netsky
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
The question is whether plaintiff corporation, under the facts alleged in its statement of claim, can recover from defendants on an oral contract for the purchase of merchandise.
The statement of claim avers that on November 28, 1942, plaintiff agreed to buy, and defendants to sell, three carloads of hair at a specified price per unit of weight amounting in the aggregate to approximately $6,480. The agreement was oral and entered into between duly authorized agents of the respective parties. On the sainé day plaintiff mailed to defendants its purchase orders…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker & Rogers v. Malsby Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Norwegian Plow Co. v. HanthornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnson v. TaborMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Milos v. CovacevichOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Galbraith v. HolmesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- W.I. Snyder Corp. v. CaraccioloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- MacIas v. Klein Appeal of Oakland Truck Sales, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953