Legal Opinion

W.I. Snyder Corp. v. Caracciolo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1988No. 1002PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Presented for our consideration in this appeal is a question of whether an oral contract is enforceable under an exception to the Statute of Frauds, 13 Pa.C.S. § 2201. Since we conclude the contract is enforceable because partial payment was made and accepted for the goods, we must also examine Appellant’s contention that Appellee should not have been entitled to recover the price of the goods which were the subject of the contract. Appellant alleges that Appellee failed to establish that it had made a reasonable effort to resell the goods as required under 13 Pa.C.S. § 2709.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Riddle Memorial Hospital v. DohanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Sands v. ForrestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. General MacHine Corp. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Mapp v. WombuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. STELWAGON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellee, v. TARMAC ROOFING SYSTEMS, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Monetti, S.P.A., and Melform U.S.A., Inc. v. Anchor Hocking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Fischer Imaging Corp. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Pilotti v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Keech v. Mead Johnson and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API