Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 1958No. 17412PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from the direction of verdict in favor of the respondent insurer because of the breach by the insured of the following provision of an automobile liability policy:

“Assistance and Cooperation of the Insured. The insured shall cooperate with the company and, upon the company’s request, shall attend hearings and trials and shall assist in effecting settlements, securing and giving evidence, obtaining the attendance of witnesses and in the conduct of suits. The insured shall not, except at his own cost, voluntarily make any payment, assume any obligation or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Meehan v. Commerical Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Crook v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Geiger v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pharr v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Cook v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. SHIFTLET v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. Hodges v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1980
  5. Portrait Homes v. Pennsylvania National MutualCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API