Legal Opinion
American Ass'n of Retired Persons v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 3, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-6866PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, American Association of Retired Persons (“AARP”) and eleven former employees of E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co. (“DuPont”), challenge a retirement program offered by DuPont on the ground that it violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. Defendant now moves to dismiss the complaint for procedural defects.
In 1985, DuPont instituted a one-time Early Retirement Opportunity program (“ERO”) in an effort to reduce its work force. Under the ERO most DuPont employees who retired or terminated their…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snair v. City of ClearwaterDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
- Becker v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988