Legal Opinion
Becker v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 11, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 86-6866Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 1988, upon consideration of the motion filed by the American Association of Retired Persons (“AARP”) for reconsideration of part of my memorandum and order dated December 3,1987, 677 F.Supp. 351, the motion is hereby granted and AARP is reinstated as a plaintiff in this action. After careful consideration of the arguments raised by the parties and accepting the allegations in the complaint as true, I conclude that injunctive or declaratory relief may be available to AARP members because the alleged discriminatory practices may be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. CriswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dillon v. ColesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Marshall v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Drez v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- American Ass'n of Retired Persons v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987