Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Borger v. Murphy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 2002PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, J:.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appealable as of right transferring venue from Philadelphia County to Lehigh County. See Pa.R.A.P. 311(e) (changes of venue). We affirm.

¶ 2 Morris Borger went to the office of John Farrell, M.D., and Harvey Passman, D.O., on September 1, 1995, for treatment of a mole on his back. Dr. Passman removed some, but not all, of the tissue and sent it to Theodore Matulewicz, M.D., for analysis. Dr. Matulewicz was uncertain of the diagnosis and sent the tissue to George Murphy, M.D. Dr. Murphy recommended the complete removal of the affected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cheeseman v. Lethal Exterminator, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Mathues v. Tim-Bar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. GOODMAN BY GOODMAN v. PizzutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bratic, A. v. Rubendall, C., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Wood v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Krosnowski v. WardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Kring v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Jackson v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API