Armata v. McDonald

This case is an action by Armata, the broker, against McDonald, the seller. On Count 1 Armata seeks the payment of $1,000, the agreed commission for procuring Adkins, as a buyer, in accordance with a purchase and sales agreement. Count 2 is based on quantum meruit for $1,000. The defendant’s answer is a general denial that no privity of contract existed between defendants and the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff in no way sold or aided in selling the premises owned by them.

This case was consolidated for purposes of trial with the case of Cecil Adkins v. Louis J. Armata in which *36the buyer,…