Sturtevant v. Selma Cotton Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Bond> J., at April Term, 1916, of JOHNSTON. Civil action, beard upon exceptions to report of referee. Upon tbe bearing tbe judge allowed all of plaintiff’s exceptions to tbe report, and found tbe facts himself and rendered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant excepted to tbe judgment and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
This action is brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract for the' purchase of certain machinery and appliances for use in defendant’s factory to be manufactured by tbe defendant especially and according to specifications to fit tbe mill. Tbe contract contained these provisions: “Delivery subject to delays beyond our control”; also, “all to be delivered f. o. b. cars at our works, Readville, Mass. "We to bave four weeks written notice of desired shipments.”
Tbe cause was referred, and upon bearing plaintiff’s exceptions to tbe report and findings of tbe referee, tbe court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Usry v. . SuitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Hawkins v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Joyner v. StancillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Jordan v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State Ex Rel. Town Council of Wadesboro v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.