Legal Opinion

Brotemarkle v. Snyder

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1950No. Civ. 17450PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

Plaintiff was riding a motor scooter near the intersection of two streets in Los Angeles. A dog “unleashed and unattended . . . dashed into and collided” with plaintiff’s motor scooter. Plaintiff was thrown to the pavement, suffered painful and serious injuries. His hospital, bill was nearly a thousand dollars.

Complaint was filed in the superior court against the owners of the dog, alleging the collision and the injuries, and violation of a city ordinance which requires every person, owner of a dog, to keep the animal “exclusively upon his own premises.” The ordinance further provides that a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Siemers v. EisenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hicks v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Hopper v. BulaichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Eigner v. RaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butler v. FriedenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  2. Endresen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tiedje v. Aluminum Taper Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Garson v. JuariqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Rollins v. HedinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API