Legal Opinion
Haynes International, Inc. v. Jessop Steel Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 8, 1994No. 91-1410PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
Prior Report: 8 F.3d 1573.
ORDER
This case is now before us on appellant’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc, filed Nov. 15, 1993 and appellee’s brief in response thereto, filed Dec. 2, 1993, which have now been considered.
In order to clarify that the estoppel in this case arose from pre-issuance activities, and to emphasize the unique circumstances present in this case, we grant the petition for rehearing for the limited purpose of making the following language changes:
Page 1577, col. 2 line 33, delete “or reissue”.
Page 1578, col. 1 line 19,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haynes International, Inc. v. Jessop Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Square Liner 360o, Inc., Appellant/cross v. Finis Lavell Chisum and Chief Industries, Inc., Appellees/crossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by30 opinions
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Forest Laboratories, Inc. And Ony, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, and Tokyo Tanabe Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Sextant Avionique, S.A. v. Analog Devices, Inc., Defendant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Matthew Stephens v. Tech InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.