Matthew Stephens v. Tech International
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Matthew Stephens and Spectrum Laboratories, Inc. (collectively “Spectrum”) appeal the order of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada granting defendants-appellees Tech International, Inc.’s and Laith R. Haddad’s (collectively “Tech’s”) motion for attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Stephens v. Tech Int’l, Inc., No. 01-CV-0070 (D.Nev. Nov. 12, 2003) (“Section 285 Order”). Because the district court erred in finding the case exceptional, we reverse.
Background
Spectrum is the owner of United States Patent No. 6,162,647 (“ ’647 patent”), which is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Forest Laboratories, Inc. And Ony, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, and Tokyo Tanabe Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Haynes International, Inc. v. Jessop Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc., and Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kao Corporation and the Andrew Jergens Company, Plaintiffs-Cross v. Unilever United States, Inc. And Conopco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Propat International Corp. v. RPost, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. Brainlab Medizinische Computersysteme GMBHCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Wedgetail, Ltd. v. Huddleston Deluxe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Sorias v. National Cellular USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.