Legal Opinion
Square Liner 360o, Inc., Appellant/cross v. Finis Lavell Chisum and Chief Industries, Inc., Appellees/cross
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1982No. 81-2342, 81-2396PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
These appeals are from an action for declaratory judgment of patent invalidity by appellant-cross appellee Square Liner 360°, Inc. (“Square Liner”) and a counterclaim by appellees-cross appellants Finis Lavell Chi-sum (“Chisum”) and Chief Industries, Inc. (“Chief”) for infringement of patent No. 3,630,066 (“ ’066”) 1 and patent No. 3,888,100 (“ ’100”). 2 After a five-week jury trial, the ’066 patent was found to be valid but not infringed, the ’100 patent was found to be valid and infringed, and Chisum and Chief, 3 his exclusive licensee, were awarded $500,000 damages ($78,000…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Alden W. Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Orthopedic Equipment Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. All Orthopedic Appliances, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Dodson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.