Billingsley v. MV Transportation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Defendant MV Transportation, Inc.’s (“MVT”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Ronald Billingsley’s (“Plaintiff’) complaint without leave to amend pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on February 28, 2017, and MVT filed a reply on March 7, 2017. The matter was taken under submission pursu*1013ant to Local Rule 230(g), and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Floro v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Ketayi v. Health Enrollment GroupDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Matthew J. Snyder, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Merrit v. CogleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024