Casey Pure Milk Co. v. Booth Fisheries Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $180. .From an order overruling separate demurrers of defendants, Hanft, J., they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Plaintiff sues two defendants, alleging that an order for goods was received from defendant Produce Company; that on October 12, 1910, plaintiff took the goods to the building occupied by both defendants, and, although the goods were intended for the Produce *118Company, they were delivered to defendant Fisheries Company; that the next day plaintiff notified the Fisheries Company to deliver the goods to the Produce Company and the Fisheries Company agreed to do so; that on the first of the following month plaintiff demanded payment of the Produce Company, that the Produce Company denied receiving…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- T. L. Oglesby's Sureties v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Brown v. Illinois Central R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Phenix Iron Foundry v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900
- Price v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nelson v. Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- American Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RiiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Knoor v. ReinekeIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Pilney v. FunkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942