Legal Opinion

Woodley v. Myers Capital Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 31, 1992No. 28787-7-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

John M. Woodley and Bruce T. Thurston, general partners of the law firm of Woodley & Thurston (hereinafter referred to collectively as Woodley & Thurston), appeal from the dismissal of their claim for expenses and attorney fees for services rendered in connection with federal bankruptcy proceedings. Respondents cross-appeal, contending that the trial court erred in denying their motion for CR 11 sanctions. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

This case arises from Woodley & Thurston's action to collect expenses and attorney fees for services rendered in the following matters.

Odessa…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Gross v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kuhlman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Powell v. Washington Land Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Feature Realty, Inc. v. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, LLPWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Feature Realty, Inc. v. KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLISWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Thompson v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API