Legal Opinion
Kuhlman v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 1, 1995No. 34116-2-IPublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Calvin Kuhlman appeals the trial court’s order of summary judgment, dismissing his complaint against various Seattle Housing Authority (SHA) officers and employees. He argues that the trial court erred by dismissing his lawsuit because the defendants did not carry their burden of proving that either res judicata or collateral estoppel applied. We affirm.
I
Facts
In July 1992, SHA disciplined two of its employees, Ku- hlman and Ernest Huertes, for allegedly harassing their female co-workers. Kuhlman responded by filing two lawsuits in King County Superior Court. In the first suit (.Kuhlman I),…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Ensley v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- DeYoung v. Cenex Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Landry v. LuscherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.