Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents an issue of first impression in this circuit. Believing, as we do, that a straightforward application of the hoary doctrine of res judicata is dis-positive of the question raised, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s civil action.
I. BACKGROUND
At all times material hereto, plaintiff-appellant Carl Kale has been a citizen and resident of Massachusetts. He was formerly employed by defendant-appellee Combined Insurance Company of America (Coinco), a “citizen” of Illinois. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c) (specifying method of determining…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Jorge Correa-Martinez v. Rene Arrillaga-BelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- James L. McCoy Administrator of the Electrical Workers Trust Funds, Etc. v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Deborah Katz Pueschel v. United States of America, Deborah Katz Pueschel v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Banco Santander De Puerto Rico v. Lopez-StubbeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Ronald C. Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.