Legal Opinion

Fay v. Fay

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

Temple H. Fay, late of Watertown, died intestate on November 14, 1921, leaving a widow, Mabel H. Fay, and four minor children of whom the respondent Cudworth was appointed guardian, giving bond with a surety company as surety. Upon his assent as guardian, the widow was appointed administratrix of the estate of the deceased without giving any surety upon her official bond. On July 6, 1922, she filed an inventory showing personal property valued at $50,526.17, and real estate valued at $7,102.38. She has resided in New York for several years and has never filed an account, although ordered so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monroe v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Murray v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Madden v. MaddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Fay v. FayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Poulin v. H. A. Tobey Lumber Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API