Legal Opinion

Chisolm v. Charlie Falk Auto Wholesalers, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 12, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 2:93cv632PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRINKEMA, District Judge.

In its present posture, this action by a group of homeowners for monetary damages against a polluter presents issues that have not been directly addressed in this Circuit. The three-count complaint seeks relief based on private nuisance (Count I), negligence (Count II), and strict liability pursuant to the Virginia Water Control Act, Va.Code Ann. § 62.1-44.34:18, (Count III). The primary issue is whether the homeowners’ mere fear of future contamination and the allegedly related diminution in property values as a result of such fear in the buying…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Domenico De Sole v. United States of America, Chesapeake Bay Yacht Racing Association, United States Yacht Racing Union, Incorporated, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. James Berry, Sr., James Berry, Sr. v. The Armstrong Rubber Company, J. Wesley Cooper v. The Armstrong Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Coakley & Williams, Inc. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  2. Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  4. Bermudez v. First of America Bank Champion, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Nora Chisolm v. Transouth Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API