Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Feld

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-3804PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On June 14, 1991, plaintiff, Gary Gilbert (“Gilbert”), filed the Complaint in the above-captioned matter against defendants David Feld (“Feld”), Zeev Shenkman (“Shenkman”), Richard Tompkins (“Tompkins”), the Law Firm of Fox, Differ, Callahan, Ulrich & O’Hara, a partnership (“Fox, Differ”), and Edmund Justice (“Justice”). The Complaint alleges causes of action against all defendants for: (1) violation of plaintiff’s civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (2) malicious prosecution, (3) abuse of process, (4) false arrest/imprisonment, (5)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Grigsby v. KaneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Russoli v. Salisbury TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Bristow v. ClevengerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Clark v. ConahanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API