Hull v. Chapel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., discharging an order requiring the defendant, as sheriff of said county, to show cause why he should not pay over certain moneys.to the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
There is no controversy as to the facts in this case. In the month of July, 1897, the plaintiff, Hull, made application under G. S. 1894, § 788, for a summary order requiring the respondent, Chapel, late sheriff of Ramsey county, to pay over to the plaintiff the sum of $1,548.50, with twenty per cent, statutory damages, for failure to. pay him money which it is alleged Chapel had received as such sheriff from one Hammond, as redemption money on a mortgage foreclosure sale.
It appears that in 1888 one Burnes, who owned real estate in Ramsey county, executed a mortgage thereon to Hull,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Custer v. AgnewIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Wilson v. BroderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hall v. SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Craig v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Farmers Nat. Bank v. WrightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- William Deering & Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- E. J. Beach & Sons v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- J. H. Allen & Co. v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.