Legal Opinion

Hall v. Swensen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1896No. Nos. 9878-(186)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Hennepin county, Bussell, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

For the purposes of this trial, and in order to relieve the parties from the necessity of calling witnesses, they stipulated as to certain facts, and the finding of the court below reads as follows:

“First. From January 1, 1891, to January 1, 1893, said defendant was the duly elected and qualified sheriff of said Hennepin county. *392Second. On the 8th day of October, 1891, the above-named plaintiff was the owner of a sheriff’s certificate of mortgage foreclosure covering, and in which certificate was described, lot 4 and north half of lot 5, block 11, Bloomington Avenue addition to Minneapolis,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GrundysenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. Mona Motor Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Hull v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Meyers v. WillseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API