State v. Rossignol

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Armand Rossignol appeals from judgments of the Superior Court (An-droscoggin County), entered on the jury’s verdicts finding him guilty of: one count of unlawful sexual contact 1 in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (1983) and two counts of simple assault in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983). Defendant argues that the Superior Court made several erroneous evidentiary rulings and that the Superior Court failed to define clearly the phrase, “corroborating evidence”, used in the jury instructions. We find no error and deny the appeal.

I

Defendant was charged…