Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 14, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Rodney Tucker appeals from a judgment of conviction of one count of gross sexual assault (Class A), 17-A M.R.S. § 253(1)(A) (2008), entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) following a jury trial. Tucker argues that the court abused its discretion and denied him a fair trial when it excluded testimony from a witness who alleged that the victim, the prosecution’s primary witness, had a reputation for untruthfulness and that exclusion of that evidence was not harmless error. We affirm the judgment.

I. CASE HISTORY

[¶ 2] In July 2007, the victim was staying temporarily…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RickerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. State v. MazerolleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. State v. MillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  5. Inhabitants of Phillips v. Inhabitants of KingfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GurneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. State of Maine v. Peter L. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  3. Gardner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API