Legal Opinion
State v. Oliver
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1988No. CR-87-0060-PR, CR-87-0130-PRPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Chief Justice.
We have consolidated the appeals of Joseph L. Oliver and David E. Cordone (Appellants). Both men have been convicted of molestation of a child in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1410, 13-701, 13-702, 13-801, and 13-803. In unpublished memorandum decisions, the court of appeals confirmed the convictions of both Oliver and Cordone.
We granted review to consider whether Appellants should receive new trials because they were precluded from introducing evidence of the victims’ prior sexual experiences with persons other than the Appellants. Appellants sought introduction of this…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BudisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. KiperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.