Legal Opinion
Sevcik v. Unlimited Construction Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided November 7, 2006No. Civ. 05-00801 ACK-BMKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
KAY, Senior District Judge.
On December 28, 2005, pro se Plaintiff Marcel Sevcik (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint against Defendant Unlimited Construction Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging numerous instances of injurious conduct that adversely affected his employment. Plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court denied Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis on January 20, 2006.
Defendant filed an Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint on January 24, 2006 (“Answer”). Plaintiff filed a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hummel v. Maricopa County Adult Probation DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- White v. County of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
- Wolf v. Discover Financial Services IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021