Hummel v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Nannette G. Hummel, No. CV-16-04381-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, 13 Defendant. 14 15 After holding a bench trial on July 26 and 27, 2021 (Docs. 104-05), the Court now 16 provides its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 In this dispute between former employer and employee, Plaintiff Nannette G. 19 Hummel sued Defendant Maricopa County Adult Probation Department (“APD”), alleging 20 violations of Title I of the Americans with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Carolyn Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.