Legal Opinion

Shull v. Dunten

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1916No. 9,449PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From DeKalb Circuit Court; Dan M. Link, Judge. Action by Allen G. Dunten against Susannah Shull. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNutt, J.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein for the following reasons: “(1) Because the record shows that no appeal was prayed from the final judgment in said cause; (2) Because the assignment of errors presents no question for review in this court, as shown by the record; (3) Because there is such a noneomplianee with Rule 22 of this court in the preparation of appellant’s brief that no question is presented to this court that can be considered under such rule.”

The cause was tried by a jury, which returned a general verdict for appellant, and also answered certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eckhart v. Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Blose v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Roe v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fox v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hill v. Chicago, Indianapolis, & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Plymouth Electric Light & Power Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Income Guaranty Co. v. ZienlinskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Humes v. Leary, Gdn.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Matthews v. National Lumber Stores, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. WEST v. McKeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API