Legal Opinion

Ho v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 23, 1987No. 85-CV-4233-DTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WOODS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant General Motors Corporation’s (GM) Motion for Summary Judgment.

Through a subsidiary, GM assisted plaintiff in the creation of his work glove supply company. From 1970-81, GM awarded plaintiff separate one year contracts to supply gloves. Plaintiff subsequently was not awarded such contracts. Plaintiff claims relief on the theory of promissory estoppel and the alleged breach of an implied-in-fact contract.

I

PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL

By plaintiff’s own admission, his claim rests not on a promise that he would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erickson v. GOODELL OIL CO. INC.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Temborius v. SlatkinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Motobecane America, Ltd. v. Patrick Petroleum Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API