Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1993No. 92-1599PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Continental Casualty Company, citing an asbestos exclusion in its professional liability policy, refused to cover costs and damages incurred in connection with certain asbestos-related claims brought by appellees against appellees’ assignors. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied Continental Casualty Company’s summary judgment motion and granted partial summary judgment to the appellees, holding that the asbestos exclusion did not bar coverage for the claims. A jury subsequently awarded appellees $450,000.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Quesenberry v. Nichols and ErieSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Lerner v. Gudelsky Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Pilot Life Insurance v. CrosswhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gulf Underwriters Insurance v. KSI Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Dyncorp v. Jorge CarniceroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Washington Airports AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Schneider v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Stone v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, LondonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.