Legal Opinion

Stone v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 21, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-1768-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

When plaintiffs’ residence was damaged by a fire, they made claims for the loss under their insurance policies with Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. (“Empire”) and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (“Lloyd’s”). Lloyd’s declined coverage on the ground that it believes the fire was intentionally set by plaintiffs. Empire, however, paid plaintiffs a pro-rata share of the loss pursuant to an Empire policy provision relating to the existence of other insurance. Plaintiffs claim here is that both insurers are jointly and severally liable for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. Buchanan v. DoeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  4. Lerner v. Gudelsky Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. CharitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API