Legal Opinion

Dyncorp v. Jorge Carnicero

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-2221PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, Dyneorp, sought a declaratory judgment that its employment contract with appellee, Jorge Carnicero, did not require it to pay him as a consultant for more than five years. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted Carnicero’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Dyneorp could not give notice of termination until after five years had elapsed and compelling Dyneorp to pay Carnicero for at least a sixth year. Dyneorp appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its construction of the employment contract. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Munir H. Atalla v. Ahmad H. Abdul-BakiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Cohan v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  4. Schneider v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AvePoint, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API