Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Otter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1950No. Appeals, Nos. 178 and 179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

Elaine R. Richmond, a minor, acting by her father, as her natural guardian, and the father and the mother in their own right sued the defendants, Lillian R. Otter and her husband, for damages due to injuries to the minor allegedly caused by the wife-defendant’s negligent operation of an automobile. At trial, the plaintiff suffered a voluntary nonsuit as to the husband-defendant and the case was proceeded with against Mrs. Otter alone. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant whereon the court below, after refusing the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Reel v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  3. District of Columbia's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Aaron v. StrausserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hart v. W.H. Stewart, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. KIRBY v. CarlisleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Campbell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Estate of Rothberg, S. Appeal of: Rothberg, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Hangey, R. v. Husqvarna Professional ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API