Legal Opinion

KIRBY v. Carlisle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeals, 85 and 86PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The question here is whether the jury was justified in finding that the minor-plaintiff suffered no injuries for which damages should be allowed when she was struck by an automobile being negligently operated by the defendant.

The verdict read “guilty of negligence but no damages allowed to the plaintiff for injuries or loss of services because there were no injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff.” President Judge McNaugher of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, before whom the case was tried, molded th'is to be a 'verdict for the defendant and entered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Sullivan v. Old Colony Street RailwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Mike v. LianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Jeloszewski v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Hoodmacher v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Gottlob v. HillegasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Bronchak v. RebmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Rose v. HooverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Gudat v. HeubergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API