Ghiz v. Richard S. Bradford, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
HORNBY, Justice.
The issue posed by the appellant in this case is whether an insurance agency has a tort obligation to “explain various types of coverage and to ensure that adequate coverage will be obtained by a person who is extensively relying upon [its] expertise” when the agency is not the customer’s agent. Although such obligations between a seller and a buyer of commodities or services may arise out of contractual or agency undertakings and out of tort duties prohibiting fraud or misrepresentation, we conclude that there is no independent duty of reasonable care and therefore affirm the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Sandbulte v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Sobotor v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Gibson v. Government Employees InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Riddle-Duckworth, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maurice v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Szelenyi v. Morse, Payson & Noyes InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Cummings Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1996
- HANSEN v. HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWESTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025