Legal Opinion

Foster v. Hudson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1939No. Civ. 6167; Civ. 6168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUTON, J., pro tem.

The above actions arose out of the same automobile accident. They were consolidated for trial and for this appeal, and will be considered together in this opinion.

The accident in question occurred about 10 o’clock P. M. on November 24, 1937, on Highway 99 in Merced County. The plaintiffs Joe Foster and Herman Baker, together with a Mr. Ewing, were in a coupe driving northward. Immediately preceding the accident, the plaintiffs observed two ears approaching from the north, one of which passed the other, and instead of swinging back to its right side of the highway,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kuhns v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jennings v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Thorpe v. ThorpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API