Legal Opinion
Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation, a Philippine Corporation v. Ned Putnam
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1970No. 23018_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (Rizal), a Philippine corporation, brought this diversity suit against Ned Putnam, a citizen of the State of Oregon, in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Rizal sought to recover $231,142.77 from Putnam under a guaranty undertaking covering a loan on a deferred letter of credit which Rizal had granted to Big Chrome Exploration Co., Inc. (Big Chrome), a Philippine corporation. The jury returned general and specific verdicts for Putnam and judgment was entered thereon. This appeal followed.
In March, 1963,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jaffke v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- M. O. S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sellers v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. RollinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Willie Johnson v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Colonial Leasing Co. of New England, Inc. v. BestDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1982
- Williams v. Bic CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.