People v. Manuel
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment which followed her conviction of the crime of forgery.
The sole error urged as ground for reversal is the ruling of the court in denying defendant’s challenge interposed to the panel of jurors summoned to try the case. The ground of the challenge was that “there has been a substantial departure from the form provided by law in this: That, the sheriff in summoning the jury failed and intentionally omitted to draw the jury from the whole body of the county . . . but confined himself to a certain part, namely, the city of Upland, and to a certain class, namely,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Wadsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- People v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- Ganz v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. ParmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- United States v. BallardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- Anderson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.