Legal Opinion

United States v. Ballard

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 8, 1940No. 14496-YPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

In all three divisions of the Southern District of California, women are excluded from both Grand Jury and Petit Jury service. The practice is not traceable to any lack of proper accommodations for mixed juries. It is merely that the Court has continued the practice which obtained before the adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (August 26, 1920), which forbade the denial or abridgement of the right to vote, by the United States or any state “on account of sex”.

Back of the policy is also the conviction of many that as the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. RoemigDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1943
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1958
  4. People v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Thiel v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API