Legal Opinion
Miyano MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Miyanohitec MacHinery, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 5, 2008No. 08 C 526PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Miyano Machinery U.S.A., Inc. (“MMU”) brings suit against MiyanoHitec Machinery, Inc. (“MiyanoHitec”), Tom Mi-yano and Steven Miyano alleging trademark infringement in violation of the Lan-ham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125(a) as well as cybersquatting, unfair competition, deceptive trade practices, and seeking a declaratory judgment. Soon after filing suit, MMU moved for a preliminary injunction barring MiyanoHitec from using any of MMU’s trademarks or tradenames, specifically the “Miyano” name, the Miya-no plain text…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ty, Inc. v. The Jones Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Diana Packman v. Chicago Tribune Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Front Page News, Incorporated, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Specht v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- MetroPCS v. DevorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Specht v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.