Redmond v. M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (In Re Coffelt)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF
ROBERT D. BERGER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 The Trustee sued Defendant M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (“M & I”) to avoid preferential transfers and to recover real property or its value for the benefit of the Estate under 11 U.S.C. §§ 544, 547, and 550. This matter constitutes a core proceeding over which this Court has jurisdiction. 2 There being no genuine issue of material fact, the Court grants the Trustee’s motion and denies the Defendant’s motion.
Findings of Fact
D…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.