Legal Opinion

Pokegama Sugar-Pine Lumber Co. v. Klamath River Lumber & Improvement Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided April 19, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

, Order to show cause why defendants should not be punished for contempt in violating a restraining order.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge

(orally). It has been determined, in passing upon tbe motion to modify the restraining order in this case, that tbe order was within tbe power of tbe court to issue. 86 Fed. 528. Tbe power vested in courts of tbe United States to punish for contempt of court is found in section 725 of tbe Revised Statutes. It provides as follows:

“The said courts shall have power to impose and administer all necessary oaths, and to punish, by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of the court, contempts of their authority: provided, that such power to punish contempts shall not be construed to extend to any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. DebsU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1894
  3. People ex rel. Gaynor v. McKaneNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Pokegama Sugar-Pine Lumber Co. v. Klamath River Lumber & Improvement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
  5. Atlantic Giant Powder Co. v. Dittmar Powder Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Growers Warehousing Corp. v. W. E. Sawyer Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  2. Colby v. OsgoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API