Legal Opinion

Atlantic Giant Powder Co. v. Dittmar Powder Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided September 27, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, C. J.

This is a motion for an attachment against the defendants, the Dittmar Powder Manufacturing Company and Carl Dittmar, for violating the preliminary injunction issued and served herein, by making and selling a blasting powder called “glukodine powder.” I am of the opinion, from the testimony, that what the defendants call glukodine is a compound made by a mechanical *317mixture of nitro-glycerine with nitro-saccharose, (or nitrated sugar,) and is not a new chemical compound; that the constituent nitroglycerine is shown to be separable, as such, from the constituent nitro-saccharose; and that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Florez v. RaynoldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KayserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Indianapolis Water Co. v. American Strawboard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1896
  3. Pokegama Sugar-Pine Lumber Co. v. Klamath River Lumber & Improvement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API