Atlantic Giant Powder Co. v. Dittmar Powder Manuf'g Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, C. J.
This is a motion for an attachment against the defendants, the Dittmar Powder Manufacturing Company and Carl Dittmar, for violating the preliminary injunction issued and served herein, by making and selling a blasting powder called “glukodine powder.” I am of the opinion, from the testimony, that what the defendants call glukodine is a compound made by a mechanical *317mixture of nitro-glycerine with nitro-saccharose, (or nitrated sugar,) and is not a new chemical compound; that the constituent nitroglycerine is shown to be separable, as such, from the constituent nitro-saccharose; and that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- De Florez v. RaynoldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KayserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Indianapolis Water Co. v. American Strawboard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1896
- Pokegama Sugar-Pine Lumber Co. v. Klamath River Lumber & Improvement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898