Legal Opinion
Binford v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2006No. 05-6052PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, David Binford, pro se, 1 filed a habeas corpus application under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 2 on December 29, 2004, contending he should be awarded credit against his federal sentence for certain time spent in state custody. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we review de novo the district court’s decision to deny habeas relief and affirm. Patterson v. Knowles, 162 F.3d 574, 575 (10th Cir.1998).
I. Factual Background
While Binford was in the custody of Oklahoma state authorities on charges of kidnaping and possession of a firearm after a former felony…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Billy Keith McGregor v. Gary Gibson, Warden, Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Van Woudenberg Ex Rel. Foor v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Orlando MoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Ronald Romandine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Walck v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Pope v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Aubry Johnson v. A. GillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lonnie Wiseman v. Patti WachendorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Charles Elwell v. Scott FisherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.