Rohda v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Appellant Robert Edward Rohda was charged with violations of state drug laws after state law enforcement officers executing a search warrant discovered marijuana in a shed on Rohda’s residential property in Buffalo, Wyoming. The search warrant was issued by a district court commissioner who had determined the existence of probable cause on the strength of an affidavit signed under oath by a special agent of the state division of criminal investigation. The affidavit included hearsay statements of other law enforcement personnel and three confidential informants. Before…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mathewson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Bouch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Speten v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Shaw v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Connor Timothy Corrigan Phippen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.